AI gold rush? New APAC research reveals major gap between AI Leaders and Followers

AI Leaders are setting themselves apart through approaches to strategies,skills,governance,and trust

40% of APAC organisations are expecting at least 3xROI on AI investments

Over $110 billion is set to be invested in AI across the region by 2028

SINGAPORE,Oct. 23,2024 -- The IDC Data and AI Pulse: Asia Pacific 2024 study,commissioned by SAS,has revealed Asia Pacific (APAC) organisations are rushing to jump onto the AI bandwagon,with nearly half (43%) planning a large investment increase in AI of over 20% in the next 12 months. While organisations are investing heavily in AI,only 18% of APAC businesses consider themselves as AI Leaders,leaving a large gap between those AI Leaders driving long-term transformational change,and AI Followers experimenting with numerous projects and lacking a clear AI strategy.

Of those surveyed,AI Leaders indicated their top business outcomes from AI initiatives are focused on driving new revenue growth (32%),increasing operational efficiency (31%) and increasing profits (26%). By comparison,AI Followers indicated improving customer service (27%),expanding market share (25%) and faster time to market (25%) as their top business outcomes.

"The disparity in target outcomes between AI Leaders and AI Followers demonstrates a lack of clear strategy and roadmap. Where AI Followers are focused on short-term,productivity-based results,AI Leaders have moved beyond these to more complex functional and industry use cases," said Shukri Dabaghi,Senior Vice President,Asia Pacific and EMEA Emerging at SAS.

"As businesses look to capitalise on the transformative potential of AI,it's important for business leaders to learn from the differences between an AI Leader and an AI Follower. Avoiding a 'gold rush' way of thinking ensures long-term transformation is built on trustworthy AI and capabilities in data,processes and skills," said Mr. Dabaghi.

"The IDC Data and AI Pulse: Asia Pacific 2024 study is an important snapshot of how hundreds of large APAC organisations are approaching adoption and implementation of AI,highlighting the leaders and followers across industries," said Chris Marshall,Vice President,Data,Analytics,AI,Sustainability,and Industry Research at IDC Asia/Pacific. "These insights give us the opportunity to unpack the barriers to successful AI implementation,allowing businesses to make wiser investments into these new and emerging technologies,without being caught-up in the gold rush".

Generative AI is only one part of the AI journey

While a great deal of AI hype has focused on generative AI,the study reveals that organisations have been investing into predictive and interpretive AI technologies. In 2023,generative AI accounted for just 19% of AI investment but by 2024,and is predicted to increase to 34% reflecting a more balanced distribution across these three AI categories.

IDC's latest spending guide suggests AI spending in Asia Pacific will reach US$45 billion in 2024,rising to US$110 billion by 2028 at 24% CAGR (2023-2028).[1]

The research reveals that organisations are reallocating budgets for the 2024 increase in generative AI investment,with a third saying it will come from redistributing funds away from infrastructure modernisation and 37 percent from application modernisation.

Expectations are high when it comes to ROI

The study reveals this prospective gold rush fuelled by inflated expectations of AI's potential return on investment. The research found that 40% of organisations surveyed expect at least a three-fold return on investment,with the "fear of missing out" continuing to spur AI spending. As a result,the research shows AI has at times been adopted without a clear alignment between investments and their outcomes and business value.

With 43% of organisations planning to increase their AI investment by 20% or more in the next 12 months,organisations risk being disillusioned with AI because of these tactical investments' likely returns. Instead,business leaders should realise that building an AI capability takes time and requires solid AI foundations to ensure long-term value add.

"While consumer access to generative AI tools made AI feel magical,integrating it into an enterprise environment takes a lot of work,the right infrastructure,and often the high expectations placed on these tools are unrealistic," says Mr. Dabaghi. "Understanding these pitfalls provides us the opportunity to learn how we tackle these issues,enabling a higher success rate,and meeting business objectives when it comes to adopting and successfully implementing AI."

Pulse of AI across industries

The study provides a detailed analysis of how AI is impacting different industry sectors in the APAC region,with key focus areas including banking,insurance,healthcare,and government sectors.

The skills-gap remains a consistent challenge across industries when it comes to successful AI adoption and implementation. This skill-gap is felt the most within the healthcare industry (41%),followed by the government sector (38%),insurance industry (32%),and less so in banking (29%). Despite this challenge,these industries continue to invest in improving theirdata and AI capabilities to deliver more streamlined decision-making,greater automation,faster time to market for new products and services,cost savings,and a host of other benefits.

Nonetheless,some use cases are being consistently and successfully deployed - in banking for instance,with its top three use cases: liquidity risk management,asset and liability management and financial crime analytics. In insurance,the research suggests we are seeing AI use cases for insurance claims fraud,omni-channel delivery of products and intelligent pricing. In health care,notable use cases include health care fraud and cost containment,while in government,the popular AI use cases relate to ensuring social benefits programme integrity,supporting emergency response,and tax and revenue compliance.

AI adoption trends vary across countries

The AI landscape in APAC varies by country,with each market showing unique adoption trends. China is leading in AI investments,showing a large increase in AI projects over the next 12 months (59 per cent),with India and Japan following suit (51 per cent; 46 per cent respectively). Furthermore,China and South Korea are advancing more rapidly in AI adoption and integration than the others. This disparity is driven by factors such as investment levels,regulatory frameworks,and the availability of AI talent and infrastructure. The lack of skilled personnel is a national as well as an industry concern in Japan,Australia and South Korea and many parts of Southeast Asia.

The research highlights the opportunities and the challenges associated with increasingAI investments across APAC in the coming years. It suggests that to unlock AI's full potential,companies must develop in-house skills,build a strong portfolio of strategic use cases and plan for AI costs and risks from the start. By doing so,they can achieve some of the promised higher returns and foster greater trust in future AI investments.

The full report is available through the eBook: Data and AI Pulse: Asia Pacific 2024.

Methodology

The study,conducted in June 2024,includes 509 executives across eight Asia Pacific markets (Australia,China,India,Japan,Korea,Malaysia,Singapore,and Thailand) and sampled organisations across banking and finance,manufacturing,government,and health care & life sciences. Leaders were surveyed to examine their AI investment decisions,how they want AI to serve their organisations,challenges to deployment,and their approaches to managing these processes to achieve trusted AI outcomes.

About SAS

SASis a global leader in data and AI. With SAS software and industry-specific solutions,organizations transform data into trusted decisions. SAS gives you THE POWER TO KNOW®.

[1] IDC's Worldwide AI and Generative AI Spending Guide,August 2024

Disclaimer: This article is reproduced from other media. The purpose of reprinting is to convey more information. It does not mean that this website agrees with its views and is responsible for its authenticity, and does not bear any legal responsibility. All resources on this site are collected on the Internet. The purpose of sharing is for everyone's learning and reference only. If there is copyright or intellectual property infringement, please leave us a message.
©Copyright 2009-2020 Yahoo Perspective   cryydr@163.com   Contact Us   SiteMap